計畫名稱:環境資源地理資訊系統先期整體規劃

計畫編號:EPA-99-L103-03-001

計畫執行單位:財團法人環境資源研究發展基金會

計畫主持人(包括協同主持人):蔡博文,孫志鴻,丁志堅

計畫期程:99年1月1日起99年11月30日止

 

 

中文摘要

  GIS的發展必需配合技術的進步與整體資訊環境的改變來進行,雲端架構與服務導向架構(SOA)是下一階段的發展趨勢,環資部的GIS也必需配合此一趨勢來發展。本規劃藍圖以SOA及雲端架構為指導原則,從資料架構、技術架構及管理架構三個面向,分析所面臨的課題,確定發展目標,研擬行動方案,並提出發展計畫,作為環資部未來進行GIS發展建置的指導準則。未來環資部應有一個統一網路服務平台,該平台藉由雲端技術達到軟硬體資源集中分享,透過健全的GIS人力與組織及合理有效的管理制度,部內與部外的使用者均能獲得通透的服務,並且達到穩健的發展。政府組織改造初期由於組織、業務及人員的異動,GIS業務不宜做大幅度的調整。同時考量GIS技術的發展與建置的階段性,整體發展階段區分為短、中及長期三個階段,本規劃就系統、人力資源及能力提昇、管理與經費需求等四個面向依短、中、長期發展階段提出可行之行動方針的建議與經費估算,並對環資部未來與國土資訊系統之間的整合關係提出初步的意見。 

英文摘要:

The development of the geographic information system (GIS) was influenced by the advancement of software techniques and the information architecture combined. The cloud architecture and the service oriented architecture (SOA) provided the future trend for the next generation GIS. It was proposed in the planning report that the GIS environment of the Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources conform to the requirements of the next generation GIS. The proposed planning blueprint was based on the principles of the SOA and the cloud architecture. The blueprint analyzed issues from three aspects: the data architecture, the technical architecture, and the management architecture. After analyzing the current issues the desired goals and action plans were proposed. The action plans served as the guidelines for the development of the Ministry’s GIS service architecture. The planning report suggested that a unified internet service platform be developed as the one-stop portal of data services and function services for the Ministry as an integrated system. The unified internet service platform would be supported by robust manpower and effective managerial institutions to provide uninterrupted services to all uses. In the initial stage of the government reengineering the changes in the GIS architecture should be kept to the minimum in order to avoid business overloading and confusion. The report suggested that the integration of the GIS architecture after the government reengineering proceed in three temporal stages: the short-term, the mid-term, and the long-term stages. Action plans and corresponding budgets were proposed for different stages.